Odcinek 338 - Organizacje pozarządowe są końmi trojańskimi Władzy Realnej
Podkast: Odtwórz w nowym oknie | Do pobrania | Osadź
Koń trojański był najwcześniejszym zarejestrowanym wojskowym psyopem. Ta operacja Psyop jest nadal stosowana na niczego nie podejrzewających populacjach i jest tak samo użyteczna jak zawsze, ale dzisiejsi oszuści przywdziali płaszcz filantropii, a ich konie trojańskie nie są drewnianymi posągami, ale organizacjami pozarządowymi oferującymi "pomoc" obcym narodom. W dzisiejszym wydaniu The Corbett Report dowiemy się, w jaki sposób organizacje pozarządowe są końmi trojańskimi głębokiego państwa.
OBEJRZYJ TEN FILM NA BITCHUTE / ODYSEE / YOUTUBE lub POBIERZ MP4
Dla osób z ograniczoną przepustowością, KLIKNIJ TUTAJ, aby pobrać mniejszą, mniejszą wersję tego odcinka.
Dla zainteresowanych jakością dźwięku, KLIKNIJ TUTAJ, aby uzyskać wersję tego odcinka w najwyższej jakości (UWAGA: bardzo duży download).
TRANSKRYPCJA:
Troja, 12 wiek pne.
Dziesięcioletnie oblężenie Troi przez Greków dobiega końca. Przebiegły Odyseusz wpadł na plan obalenia obrony trojanów. Grecy budują gigantycznego drewnianego konia, a następnie udają, że odpływają, pozostawiając konia u bram Troi jako pozorną ofiarę dla bogini Ateny. Trojanie, wierząc, że dar uczyni ich miasto nie do zdobycia, zabierają je w bramy miasta.
Ale to sztuczka. Odyseusz i jego ludzie są ukryci wewnątrz pustego konia i wyłaniają się w nocy, aby otworzyć bramy i wpuścić grecką armię, która wróciła, aby zdobyć miasto. Trojany nie mają szansy uczyć się na swoich błędach; Grecy plądrują miasto i masakrują jego mieszkańców.
Koń trojański był najwcześniejszym zarejestrowanym wojskowym psyopem. Lekcja z tej historii, zapisana w radzie, aby "strzeżcie się Greków niosących dary", jest taka, że nie powinniśmy zawieść naszej obrony, gdy niegdysiejszy wróg oferuje nam pomoc. Dziś ta rada jest tak samo przydatna jak zawsze, ale dzisiejsi oszuści przywdziali płaszcz filantropii, a ich konie trojańskie nie są drewnianymi posągami, ale organizacjami pozarządowymi oferującymi "pomoc" obcym narodom.
Gorzka prawda jest taka, że w zaskakującej liczbie przypadków organizacje pozarządowe są końmi trojańskimi Władzy Realnej.
To jest sprawozdanie Corbetta.
W 2015 roku Kirgistan wykonał coś, co na pierwszy rzut oka może wydawać się zaskakujące: anulował traktat o współpracy z USA, który obowiązywał od 1993 roku. Traktat przyznał ulgi podatkowe i przywileje celne organizacjom takim jak Amerykańska Agencja ds. Rozwoju Międzynarodowego (USAID) i dał ich pracownikom immunitet dyplomatyczny w kraju. Wszystko to skończyło się po tym, jak USA przyznały nagrodę praw człowieka Azimjonowi Askarovowi, aktywiście wtrąconemu do więzienia na całe życie za "stworzenie zagrożenia dla pokoju społecznego i stabilności społecznej" po zamieszkach w Uzbekistanie w południowym Kirgistanie w 2010 roku.
Reakcja zwykłych zachodnich mediów była szybka i przewidywalna: Kirgistan stracił rozum. A dokładniej: to wszystko wina Putina. Jakoś. Ale nie martwcie się, USA i tak będą nadal pomagać Kirgistanowi, czy im się to podoba, czy nie, ponieważ tak po prostu się toczą. Idź, drużyno Ameryki!
Ale Kirgistan nie jest jedynym krajem, który rozprawia się z "pomocą" zagranicznych organizacji pozarządowych. W ciągu ostatnich kilku lat szereg krajów, w tym Rosja, Chiny i Indie, przyjęło przepisy nakładające ściślejszą kontrolę na działalność tych organizacji w swoich granicach.
MARGARET HOWELL: Rosja rzuca klapsa na biedne, małe, stare organizacje pozarządowe, te organizacje charytatywne, które zostały założone. Ich rozumowanie? Że mogą próbować obalić Kreml.
Kreml zamierza zakazać wspieranej przez USA Fundacji MacArthura, Instytutu Społeczeństwa Otwartego George'a Sorosa i dziesięciu ich zagranicznych grup, nazywając je "niepożądanymi organizacjami" przez prawo. Zastanawiają się także nad czymś, co nazywa się "patriotyczną listą zatrzymań". Każdemu, kto zostanie przyłapany na współpracy z tymi grupami, grozi sześć lat więzienia.
ŹRÓDŁO: Rosja zakazuje zagranicznych organizacji pozarządowych
KOTWICA: Chiny przyjęły pierwszą w kraju ustawę regulującą zagraniczne organizacje pozarządowe.
HAO YUNHONG (LEKTOR): Chiński rząd zawsze zaprasza zagraniczne organizacje pozarządowe do Chin w celu rozszerzenia działalności kulturalnej i charytatywnej, a władze chińskie wysoko cenią wasze osiągnięcia. Istnieje jednak kilka nielegalnych wyjątków, w których organizacje pozarządowe przybywają do Chin, aby zaszkodzić bezpieczeństwu narodowemu.
KOTWICA: Prawo obejmuje działalność organizacji pozarządowych założonych poza Chinami kontynentalnymi. Muszą zarejestrować się w organach bezpieczeństwa publicznego i zadeklarować, skąd pochodzą ich fundusze.
ŹRÓDŁO: Chiny przyjmują ustawę regulującą zagraniczne organizacje pozarządowe
REPORTER: Indie umieściły Fundację Forda na liście obserwacyjnej i nakazały przekazywanie wszystkich funduszy z amerykańskiej organizacji non-profit do odbiorców dopiero po zatwierdzeniu przez Ministerstwo Spraw Wewnętrznych. Powołując się na względy bezpieczeństwa narodowego, Ministerstwo Spraw Wewnętrznych zwróciło się do Banku Rezerw Indii o zapewnienie, że fundusze przekazane przez Fundację Forda indyjskim odbiorcom zostaną powiadomione i rozdysponowane dopiero po ich oczyszczeniu. Ministerstwo stwierdziło w swoim zarządzeniu, że chce zapewnić, że fundusze pochodzące z Fundacji Forda zostaną wykorzystane na działalność społeczną w dobrej wierze bez uszczerbku dla interesów narodowych i bezpieczeństwa.
Egipski sąd skazał 43 egipskich i 16 amerykańskich pracowników organizacji pozarządowych za nielegalną pracę w Egipcie przy jednoczesnym zachęcaniu do zamieszek. Oskarżeni, którzy w większości byli nieobecni w sądzie, zostali skazani na pięć lat więzienia. Werdykt wzywa do zamknięcia amerykańskich grup non-profit, takich jak International Republican Institute i National Democratic Institute oraz Freedom House, które w 2012 roku Egipt oskarżył o nielegalne finansowanie i działanie bez licencji.
Egipski sąd skazuje pracowników organizacji pozarządowych, w tym Amerykanów, na pięć lat więzienia
Więc co u licha się dzieje? Dlaczego wszystkie te kraje wyrzucają wszystkie te pozarządowe i quasi-rządowe podmioty z siedzibą w USA? Dlaczego mieliby sprzeciwiać się dobroczynności i pomocy?
Odpowiedź nie jest trudna do zrozumienia. Organizacje te są końmi trojańskimi: zaprojektowanymi tak, aby wyglądać jak prezenty, ale zawierają tajne drzwi-pułapki, przez które ukryte siły mogą wejść do kraju i potajemnie osłabić rządy, o których mowa. To wyjaśnienie brzmi dziwacznie tylko dla tych, którzy nie patrzą dalej niż nazwy organizacji i nie mają pojęcia o ich historii działalności.
Weźmy na przykład USAID. Utworzona w 1961 roku na mocy dekretu, jest amerykańską agencją rządową, która stara się "położyć kres skrajnemu ubóstwu i promować odporne, demokratyczne społeczeństwa, jednocześnie zwiększając nasze bezpieczeństwo i dobrobyt". Dlaczego więc prezydent Morales wyrzucił ich z Boliwii w 2013 roku? Bo jest szalony i irracjonalny? Albo dlatego, że USAID prowadził program za pośrednictwem swojego niezwykle szczerego Biura Inicjatyw Przejściowych, który zapewnił 10,5 miliona dolarów finansowania "Wzmocnienia Instytucji Demokratycznych" w całym kraju, w tym w obszarach bastionów opozycji? Czy była to paranoja ze strony Moralesa, czy tylko uznanie, że mętna retoryka o "wzmacnianiu instytucji demokratycznych" jest słabo zawoalowanym eufemizmem dla "obalenia rządu", dokładnie tak, jak ujawniły wycieki dokumentów dyplomatycznych, tak jak w przypadku identycznie nazwanego programu USAID w Wenezueli?
EVA GOLINGER: USAID była pierwotnie agencją stworzoną w celu dostarczania pomocy humanitarnej i pomocy w przypadku katastrof krajom w potrzebie, a w latach 1980. i 1990. i więcej w 21 wieku przekształciła się w ramię polityczne i gałąź finansowania rządu USA za to, co nazywają "promowaniem demokracji". I jest to teraz część amerykańskich kampanii przeciwko rebeliantom, które angażują Pentagon [i] Departament Stanu, jeśli chodzi o dyplomację i oczywiście działania wojenne. USAID jest trzecią agencją zaangażowaną w walkę z rebelią, a jej celem jest właśnie zapewnienie tego, co nazwali pomocą w promowaniu demokracji lub stabilizacji lub pomocy krajowi w jakiejś transformacji politycznej lub gospodarczej.
W przypadku Wenezueli Wenezuela jest krajem, który jest bogaty w ropę naftową, więc nigdy nie kwalifikuje się do jakiejkolwiek bezpośredniej pomocy USAID. Dlatego USAID nigdy nie miał tu oficjalnie biura i nie przybyli do kraju i nie założyli biura aż do 2002 roku, tuż przed zamachem stanu przeciwko prezydentowi Chavezowi. A dokumenty – wewnętrzne dokumenty uzyskane na mocy ustawy o wolności informacji – ujawniają, że jedynym zamiarem utworzenia biura tutaj w Wenezueli była pomoc siłom opozycyjnym w ostatecznym odsunięciu Chaveza od władzy.
Czy rządy powinny ufać USAID po tym, jak ujawniono, że agencja potajemnie stworzyła własną sieć mediów społecznościowych na Kubie w wyraźnym celu podważenia rządu Castro? Albo kiedy ujawniono, że USAID wysłał zespół agentów na Kubę pod przykrywką "programów zdrowotnych i obywatelskich", aby wzniecić bunt wśród młodzieży, w tym stworzyć fałszywe warsztaty zapobiegania HIV, które sama agencja opisała jako "doskonałą wymówkę" do "zidentyfikowania potencjalnych aktorów zmiany społecznej"? Albo kiedy ujawniono, że agencja próbowała (i żałośnie się nie udało) zinfiltrować kubańską scenę hip-hopową "w celu przełamania blokady informacyjnej" i wywołania młodzieżowego ruchu "zmiany społecznej" w kraju?
KOTWICA: Amerykańska agencja przeniknęła do kubańskiego świata hip-hopu, próbując uruchomić ruch młodzieżowy przeciwko tamtejszemu rządowi. Tajna operacja próbowała wykorzystać kubańskich raperów do zbudowania sieci młodych ludzi poszukujących zmian społecznych. Ale reżim kubański przyjął się i operacja zakończyła się niepowodzeniem. W tym procesie Amerykańska Agencja Rozwoju Międzynarodowego nieumyślnie skompromitowała żywą kulturę muzyczną, która wywołała ostrą oddolną krytykę kraju. Kilku artystów, których agencja próbowała promować, opuściło Kubę lub przestało występować po naciskach ze strony rządu.
ŹRÓDŁO: USAID Próba dokooptowania kubańskiej sceny hip-hopowej kończy się niepowodzeniem
W rzeczywistości programy czarnych operacji USAID mające na celu podważenie zagranicznych rządów sięgają aż do założenia samej agencji. Niektóre z niedociągnięć obejmują "Biuro Bezpieczeństwa Publicznego" USAID i jego udział w prowadzeniu programu frontowego CIA w celu szkolenia zagranicznej policji w zakresie tortur i taktyk terroru w Ameryce Łacińskiej; współfinansowanie (wraz z CIA) przemytu opium Xieng Khouang Air Transport, prywatnej linii lotniczej dla handlarza narkotykami (i pracownika CIA w Laosie) generała Vang Pao; oraz współfinansowanie grup opozycyjnych na Ukrainie (przed zamachem stanu w 2014 r.) z popierającym Glenna Greenwalda Pierre'em Omidyarem i oczywiście George'em Sorosem.
FAREED ZAKARIA: George Soros, miło cię gościć.
GEORGE SOROS: Tak samo tutaj.
ZAKARIA: Po pierwsze, jeśli chodzi o Ukrainę: Jedną z rzeczy, które wielu ludzi rozpoznaje w tobie, było to, że podczas rewolucji 1989 roku finansowałeś wiele działalności dysydenckiej, grup społeczeństwa obywatelskiego w Europie Wschodniej i Polsce, Czechach. Czy robicie podobne rzeczy na Ukrainie?
SOROS: Cóż, założyłem fundację na Ukrainie, zanim Ukraina uniezależniła się od Rosji, i fundacja działa od tego czasu i odegrała ważną rolę w dzisiejszych wydarzeniach.
ŹRÓDŁO: George Soros przyznaje, że odgrywa integralną rolę w kryzysie ukraińskim
Ale ten problem organizacji pozarządowych / koni trojańskich nie ogranicza się bynajmniej do USAID i powiązanych z nim organizacji. Weźmy National Endowment for Democracy (NED) jako kolejny przykład.
Oficjalna wersja jest taka, że NED został utworzony w 1983 roku aktem Kongresu w celu "zachęcenia do ustanowienia i wzrostu demokratycznego rozwoju" w krajach docelowych na całym świecie zgodnie z celami polityki zagranicznej USA.
Rzeczywista historia jest taka, że NED został stworzony wyraźnie jako przykrywka do finansowania działań CIA w krajach docelowych, fakt, że Allen Weinstein, jeden z członków grupy badawczej, która doprowadziła do założenia NED, otwarcie chwalił się w The Washington Post: "Wiele z tego, co robimy dzisiaj, zostało zrobione potajemnie 25 lat temu przez CIA, " Cytowano jego słowa. Jeszcze bardziej rażące jest przyznanie się ówczesnego dyrektora Centralnego Wywiadu Williama Caseya, który napisał notatkę do Białego Domu, opowiadając się za utworzeniem NED, ale ostrzegając, że "my tutaj [w CIA] nie powinniśmy wychodzić na czoło w rozwoju takiej organizacji, ani nie chcemy wyglądać na sponsora lub adwokata".
Udział NED w tajnych kampaniach destabilizacyjnych rywalizuje z udziałem USAID i, podobnie jak USAID, obejmuje zbyt wiele operacji, aby je wszystkie tutaj szczegółowo opisać. Słabe światła obejmują:
- Finansowanie programu "Project Democracy", który stał się rdzeniem tajnego rządu Olivera Northa w latach Iran-Contras.
- Manipulowanie wyborami w Nikaragui w 1990 roku w celu obalenia Ortegi i sandinistów.
- Obalenie rządów Bułgarii w 1990 r. i Albanii w 1991 r.
- I wspieranie każdej większej kolorowej rewolucji okresu nowożytnego, od rewolucji róż w Gruzji do tulipanowej rewolucji w Kirgistanie i pomarańczowej rewolucji na Ukrainie dziesięć lat temu do niedawnego nieudanego "elektrycznego Erywań" w Armenii i wielu innych pomiędzy...
RON PAUL: A co z Ukrainą? Rozumiem, że jest kilka organizacji, które były zaangażowane w to na Ukrainie, próbując przeszkadzać temu rządowi. Oczywiście sporo rozmawialiśmy na ten temat, ale nie zdawałem sobie sprawy, jak bardzo NED jest tam zaangażowany.
DANIEL MCADAMS: I to jest duży problem, ponieważ myślę, że zdecydowanie można argumentować, że NATO powinno było zakończyć się po zimnej wojnie, ale zdecydowanie National Endowment for Democracy powinno zostać zakończone po zimnej wojnie. Zamiast tego mówią, jak w przypadku każdego programu rządowego: "Nie, teraz jest czas, abyśmy potrzebowali więcej!"
Ale na Ukrainie tylko w ubiegłym roku... Ach, to jest interesujący artykuł napisany przez prezesa National Endowment for Democracy – jest prezydentem dożywotnim – Carla Gershmana. Wiem, że to może cię zszokować, ale tak naprawdę jest trockistą. Był członkiem-założycielem komunistycznej partii separatystycznej, trockistowskich socjaldemokratów USA. Napisał artykuł wstępny w The Washington Post [w] wrześniu '13, tuż przed wydarzeniami na Ukrainie, i pisał jako prezes National Endowment for Democracy. Powiedział: "Ukraina jest największą nagrodą". I wspomniał, że "wybór Ukrainy o przyłączeniu się do Europy przyspieszy upadek ideologii rosyjskiego imperializmu, którą reprezentuje Putin", a "Putin może znaleźć się na straconej pozycji nie tylko w bliskiej zagranicy, ale w samej Rosji". Tak więc jego prawdziwym celem jest zmiana reżimu. Wyjaśnił to tuż przed tymi wszystkimi wydarzeniami.
Tego typu operacje koni trojańskich były używane setki razy w przeszłości i nic nie wskazuje na to, że państwo głębinowe jest gotowe porzucić tę sztuczkę. Wręcz przeciwnie.
Zadziałało to podczas "arabskiej wiosny", kiedy nawet The New York Times beztrosko przyznał, że przywódcy protestów "otrzymali szkolenie i finansowanie od grup takich jak Międzynarodowy Instytut Republikański, Narodowy Instytut Demokratyczny i Freedom House", a Departament Stanu beztrosko przyznał, że wydał 50 milionów dolarów na pomoc działaczom w sieci regionalnej. komunikują się i organizują ze sobą za pośrednictwem konia trojańskiego organizacji pozarządowych, takich jak Movements.org.
Oszustwo zadziałało również w Syrii, gdzie wyciekły dokumenty dowiodły, że USA od 2006 r. udzielały milionów dolarów wsparcia grupom opozycyjnym w tym kraju za pośrednictwem różnych organizacji pozarządowych zajmujących się końmi trojańskimi, takich jak Ruch na rzecz Sprawiedliwości i Rozwoju.
I jak widzieliśmy na początku tego roku w "Białe Hełmy są konstruktem propagandowym", nawet grupy pierwszego reagowania, takie jak "Syryjska Obrona Cywilna" (założona przez byłego brytyjskiego oficera wywiadu wojskowego) zostały wykorzystane jako konie trojańskie do szerzenia propagandy i realizacji agendy USA i ich sojuszników w ich dążeniu do obalenia prezydenta Assada.
Postawmy sprawę jasno: nie oznacza to, że wszystkie organizacje pozarządowe są końmi trojańskimi. Nie jest tak, że każda grupa lub program, który otrzymuje pieniądze od USAID, National Endowment for Democracy lub podobnej organizacji, jest automatycznie agentem głębokiego państwa. Nie tak działa technika konia trojańskiego.
Nie, tym, co sprawia, że te organizacje pozarządowe są tak skuteczne jako przykrywka dla operacji zmiany reżimu, jest to, że przez większość czasu robią to, co twierdzą, że robią: zapewniają pomoc, wsparcie i działalność charytatywną tam, gdzie jest to potrzebne. To właśnie z tego powodu USA i ich sojusznicy mogą tak skutecznie oczerniać sceptyków organizacji pozarządowych jako szalonych.
Ale rozważ to: w 1938 roku Kongres USA uchwalił ustawę o rejestracji zagranicznych agentów (FARA). Z godnym uwagi wyjątkiem AIPAC, organizacje pozarządowe, grupy lobbystyczne i osoby reprezentujące zagranicznego agenta są zobowiązane do rejestracji zgodnie z ustawą i podlegają większej kontroli dokumentacji finansowej i innych działań. Ironia polega na tym, że FARA jest zasadniczo tym samym rodzajem ustawodawstwa, które zostało niedawno uchwalone w Chinach, ale kiedy Chińczycy to robią, jest to szaleństwo; Kiedy Stany Zjednoczone zrobiły to 70 lat temu, był to po prostu zdrowy rozsądek. Po raz kolejny hipokryzja jest oczywista dla tych, którzy chcą ją zobaczyć.
Jeśli można z tego wyniknąć coś dobrego, to to, że społeczeństwo jest coraz bardziej świadome tego rodzaju tajnych działań. Być może bardziej do rzeczy, ofiary tych operacji są teraz bardziej skłonne przeciwstawić się USA (i cierpieć z powodu ich potencjalnego gniewu dyplomatycznego) poprzez kontrolowanie, monitorowanie, obserwowanie, regulowanie, a nawet wyrzucanie tych agentów chaosu.
A teraz, podobnie jak trojany tysiące lat temu, świat uczy się na własnej skórze, że czasami "prezent" lepiej pozostawić nieotwarty.
Zapisano w: Podcasty
Subskrybować
Jeśli podobał Ci się ten artykuł, subskrybuj, aby otrzymywać więcej takich jak on.
Świetny film! To coraz bardziej frustrujące, jak świadomie ślepi są Amerykanie na własną historię. Jakby ta grupa, ten wysiłek, ten prezydent był dziś jakoś inny, pomimo wszystkich dowodów przeciwnych i tych samych wyników rok po roku. Myślę, że jesteśmy naprawdę "skazani na powtarzanie tego", jak to się mówi. Dziękuję za twoją niezmiennie wyjątkową pracę, James.
Corbett niedawno "podłączył" jeden z twoich filmów (z "Zalecanym oglądaniem" w ostatnim artykule).
Wykonujesz świetną robotę raportowania.
Dzięki!
Witaj włóczędze,
Podczas twojej ostatniej audycji usłyszałem, jak wołasz; Moralność jest "CAŁKOWICIE subiektywną rzeczą"
Sugeruję w odniesieniu do historii, że sam jesteś "skazany na jej powtarzanie".
Mam hipotezę na temat tego, dlaczego masy ludzi powtarzają głupie rzeczy w całej historii. Ludzie są jedynym gatunkiem na ziemi, który będzie robił to samo w kółko, mając nadzieję na inny wynik. Kluczową różnicą między ludźmi a innymi gatunkami w tym względzie jest nasza wyobraźnia. Myślę, że ludzka wyobraźnia sprawia, że ludzie wyobrażają sobie różowe wyniki z wydarzeń, które wciąż dają te same wyniki (np. głosowanie).
Druga część mojej hipotezy pochodzi z pomysłu, który Larken Rose wykuwa w swojej książce The Most Dangerous Superstition. Czyli wiara w autorytet lub "prawo do rządzenia". Większość ludzi wierzy, że politycy mają prawo tworzyć prawa i wydawać polecenia, ponieważ wierzą, że jest to konieczne w cywilizowanym społeczeństwie. Jest wielu ludzi, którzy zdają sobie sprawę, że historia się powtarza i że władcy polityczni wykorzystują ludzi raz za razem, ale większość nie wyobraża sobie świata bez władcy, który "utrzymuje porządek" i "zapobiega chaosowi". Myślę, że jest to poważna rzecz, której ludzie się boją. Nieustanne uwarunkowanie od dzieciństwa przykuwa ludzi do przekonania, że potrzebują autorytetu, aby żyć w cywilizowany sposób i że "władze" mają prawo użyć siły, aby to osiągnąć.
Aby dodać zamieszania, przeczytałem dziś rano mem (teraz świat jest bezpieczny!) i było tam coś w rodzaju: "Nie boimy się nieznanego, ale boimy się końca znanego". Ludzie nie lubią zmian, mimo że zmiana nie jest ani dobra, ani zła i jest jedyną stałą w życiu. Lubimy nasze koleiny, podobnie jak nasi właściciele. JimBob, który nie ma właściciela, ale może to dlatego, że nikt nie chce go posiadać poza dzikimi kurczakami wędrującymi na zewnątrz.
My theory on why people do what they do is based on laziness and unwillingness to change. The theory is so simple I don’t think it needs too much explanation, the good ole’ kiss.
Socialization works well in tandem with these as the public gets lulled into the “everything is peachy, no problem, no sweat” state of mind, something that, especially with age, becomes harder and harder to break out from. The “prison for your mind” thing.
Another thing that keeps people down, in this age of information, is bad schooling. I guess it had to be introduced in this past century to curb the flow of free ideas.
Let’s not forget the non-charitable NGO’s that unleash these pseudo-philanthropists. Examples include; CFR, UN, IMF, etc.
We’re being asked to accept rule by un-elected “governance” in the name of “sustainable development” as this most recent, antiquated system quickly loses it’s veil.
i.e. rule by “experts”
All this in a world where new tech allows us all to live off the grid with zero carbon emissions.
This is the insanity which Gnostic’s are suggesting we conform to, as they try to give birth to their pipe dream.
Think this is not about religion folks? It’s all about religion.
The elimination of all…save theirs.
This is another example of how excellent is the work of James Corbett. It says clearly and specifically what people think in vague and muddy thoughts. People like me, at least.
Yes another great report James.
There’s just one thing I don’t get though.
“Take US Aid for example, created in 1961 by executive order, it’s a U.S. government agency that seeks “to end extreme poverty…” ”
“Take the N.E.D. as another example. The official story is that the N.E.D. was created in 1983 by an act of Congress in order to encourage the establishment and growth of democratic development…”
USAid an NGO?
N.E.D. an NGO?
How can groups created by the government be non-governmental orgs?
Aren’t they oxymorons?
Good morning Fawlty Towers,
I see your dilemma, so lets widen the lens a bit.
As long as we’re talking about Trojan Horses, we may as well just throw in D.C. and all the rest ’round the world.
We all know who steers the good ship Gnostic: Un-elected “NGO’s”
This (of course) qualifies our own, antiquated, sham governments THEMSELVES
as NGO’s.
…but we all know that.
The government organizations, USAID and NED for example, are used to funnel funds into NGOs and other organizations that then spend the funds towards the objectives of regime change or whatever else. This creates a degree of separation for plausible deniability.
…it would be easier to just name the relevant organizations which are NOT controlled by the un-elected…
…unfortunately, none come to mind at present.
Give me a few millennium. Perhaps I can think of one.
I don’t know how your Spanish is, but the whole operation of arresting Hugo Chaves and instituting a puppet was worse than Sharon Stone’s acting skill.
The problem with oil is not its scarcity. Actually it’s its abundance.
That’s for sure willrock,
The problem is indeed today’s abundance of all energy in general, and our increased ability to harvest it for ourselves outside the draconian “smart grid”.
Meanwhile, tightening control policies over the masses are accelerating for that very reason, i.e.: The elite are in panic.
We don’t need them, nor do they need us to fill their factories anymore.
Something’s got to give as the industrial age winds down.
Either the young folk get a (compartmentalized) job in bio-engineering to further “the agenda” or go away.
Very nice report James, I have enjoyed it…
it also further confirms the value wise old-age sayings and how important to follow them.. You should do a report on this…
for example…
“There ain’t no such thing as a free lunch”
if people follow this very basic statement, then you will know that now one is going to give you anything without return.. Not even the “soup kitchens” in NY or any other city…
but the problem is… I think majority of Corbertt Report members would work for an NGO at $200K a year in a heartbeat. They will know it is shady, but they will join because “they mean well”.
again.. it is all Human Nature… (were is the in-depth report on human nature when it comes to this) 🙂
VoA,
I would argue that there is no such thing as “human nature.” First I would ask, can it be defined? There is no clear definition of it because people act in different ways all the time, and there are infinite possibilities of how people can act. There is no way to model it accurately because we are all individuals making free and spontaneous choices.
I think majority of Corbertt Report members would work for an NGO at $200K a year in a heartbeat. They will know it is shady, but they will join because “they mean well”.
again.. it is all Human Nature… (were is the in-depth report on human nature when it comes to this)
It seems that what you are doing here is speculating.
Hello scpat,
Thanks for your comment above, however, Facebook would disagree with you as they have models for how people act under certain conditions, and ways they can socially engineer those people at will…
for the second part, I am speculating, however, it would be interesting if people ask themselves that question, and answer it truthfully.
After all… large number of doctors are selling drugs and services that people don’t really need, but they feel it is ok to do as long as they help few people from suffering.
I guess (and it is a guess), large number of the population would be OK with doing bad things as long as they don’t “see it” explicitly – i.e. they can say, we did not know….
So you believe Facebook has modeled this thing called “human nature.” I don’t know what exactly they have modeled, but I would guess that they have modeled certain human behaviors. The problem with your idea is that those behaviors lumped together don’t equal human nature, because who is to say exactly what that term can mean. It is a vague term that can’t describe anything because there is so much variation in human action and interaction. We are not a uniform mass that can be broadly described by the term “human nature.”
Hello Voice of Arabi,
Pursuant to your closing line. You certainly do not have to hazard a guess.
People have always rationalized their bad behavior. The controllers know this, and reinforce it.
Human behavior is FAR AND AWAY, the elite’s most studied.
Here’s an early example of intimate data collection:
So you’ve sinned have you? Tell us all about it, and how you feel about your bad behavior, in this dark “confession” booth. We’ll absolve you of everything with a few prayer exercises, and thanks for the “confidential” information on how better to promote obfuscation.
Behaviour follows automatically from belief and definition – though it may be expressed or suppressed.
The study of guilt, fear, shame and wishful magic, is the armouring of the manipulator who can then interject in what the target is already doing (to themselves). They can also generate and cultivate the conditions that encourage and nurture guilt, fear, shame and false hope.
It is easy to see this in others. less so to catch ourselves in act.
Obfuscation of a direct awareness of reality is the engagement of ‘thinking’, identity in conflict but seeking to assign the cause away from itself – except where playing victim operates a better defence.
The idea of mind-control is built into our notion of the function and nature of mind.
The belief in power is almost exclusively rooted in a belief in powerlessness – such that shared power sounds like a self contradiction. But that is the true nature of true communication.
Who among us seeks out all that is worthy in those we meet or even think upon?
Does not the mind automatically judge and seek the witnesses to its judgement – and is not the judgement a sense of lack of worth – if not an image of things we justify hating, withdrawing blessing from and withholding the extension of worth?
Oh if people tick our boxes we ‘like them’ as long as they don’t paint over the lines we set.
The mind is completely blind to its own activity and we see many examples of this in those we love to hate or judge against in (self) righteous arrogance.
First we judge our behaviour after the fact. And this fact is worth noting. Hindsight applied backwards makes guilt in place of learning, or awakening a true responsibility. Beware the deceiver and be awake to where you receive from. Self-hate rises from a false self image.
Human nature is revealed by its denials and corruptions. You couldn’t have a usurping or fake reality without a genuine to pass off as.
Human deceit is a substitution reality – ie fake or masked. What we call human consciousness is generally a dissociated and displaced subjective model of self-justification for denial or evasion of the true – as a result of being phished into and identifying in the false – hence the reversal.
The nature of our being is thus filtered and distorted through layers of (self) definition – such that the movement of oneness becomes the urge to dominate (for example).
One of the things I feel in ‘world-watching’ is that it reflects self-knowledge that such a world was made to hide – ie – we WANT to ‘see evil’ OUT THERE to evade or mitigate our own core responsibility (to ourself).
The psychic-emotional construct of the personality/society is predicated to mask (deny) its fear and guilt by displacement and projection onto ‘others’ who are then attacked, penalised, made sacrifice of.
So the underlying ‘model’ is protected with the ongoing sacrifice of the living – where that model is a hidden or unowned addictive compulsion.
Living FROM a sense of self-lack is a form of tyranny whatever forms it takes. Uncovering the nature of simple presence in its own light – and not a a weaponised or marketised subversion of the masking form – is the restoring of the alignment in being – rather than ‘fear thinking’.
The nature of being is humanly expressed and embodied through the ideas we accept true for us (for whatever reason, and this includes ‘unconscious belief’).
Living under terror is no capacity to live – so where the terror is made real by reaction, that reaction is a form of appeasement or alignment by which to hide from or evade the fear and pain of loss.
I like that phrase “see evil” that you use. Funny how people do see evil in anything that’s not the way they’re thinking it oughta be. I can see how it might make sense to take note of different things, but most people prefer fear. And so they remain enslaved. JimBob who often sits outside the cave people’s place while they’re watching the shadows and just ups and starts playing his bagpipes. Badly. As if there is a good way to play them. What were these Scots thinking? Bagpipes, golf, hagus? At least they gave us Scotch. God bless the Scots.
Hello brian.s,
Very interesting post, and some of it went above my head, but i will try reading it again few more times.
You should consider doing an interview with James Corbett on this subject as you appear to have knowledge on a topic that our enemy studies in depth, and we almost know nothing about… (let us not forget.. we know (almost) nothing about “ourselves”
This Warburg “non-governmentally funded” “Think Tank” The Institute for Policy Studies also has quite an intriguing history in achieving Deep State objectives (according to Daniel Estulin and a couple of others, at least):
ips-dc.org/about/
educate-yourself.org/nwo/nwotavistockbestkeptsecret.shtml
pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/lofiversion/index.php?t4341.html
wikipedia.org/wiki/Institute_for_Policy_Studies
The modern “Gatekeeper’s” genitor among other things…?
I would be interested if anyonyone had some information on Amnesty International? As I noticed them in the visuals a couple of times.
I have my suspicions about them but have not found any information that sounds conclusive when presented to the layman.
I’m also interested in them because it is common for them to be fundraising in malls around where I live.
That’s a double shame. It’s bad enough when some rich bastard is spending their money to spread propaganda, but when the money comes from the well intentioned who can’t really afford it.
Hey Octium,
I’m sure (as it should be) you’re not giving them a dime.
My grandfather gave me some great advice when I came of age;
“beware the do good-ers…they’ll do ya’ good”
I’m also interested in them because it is common for them to be fundraising in malls around where I live.
That’s a double shame. It’s bad enough when some rich bastard is spending their money to spread propaganda, but when the money comes from the well intentioned who can’t really afford it.
In a similar vein…
I contacted The Intercept to ask about their current “fundraising” efforts.
I found it rather strange that they would be fundraising so soon after receiving $250 million from Omidyar.
I mean with a staff of about a dozen or so, how much money could they possibly need in one year?
$2, $3, $4 million?
What was their answer?
“It’s for the future, you never know”. Yeah right. B.S.!
wrongkindofgreen.org/2017/02/09/amnesty-international-humanitarian-spin-merchants-and-propaganda-peddlers/
wrongkindofgreen.org/category/non-profit-industrial-complex-organizations/organizations/human-rights-watch/
You know, I’d heard some rumors about them before, but the way it had been presented it seemed like they were infiltrated and not directed. But notice how easily they are uncovered. Their plans all depend upon people not paying attention. Those days are numbered. JimBob who hopes it ain’t too many numbers as he was a history major and not a math major for a pretty good reason.
Thanks for that, yes that was the kind of information I was after. Interesting too that many of the sources in the article are the same ones as being attacked by the Unmentionable Woman as well.
You’re very welcome; I wish I could be of greater assistance. I’ll have to take a closer look asap.
Thanks to the two links you provided, manbearpig, I explored the new-to-me website WrongKindOfGreen.org and discovered, among other gems, a book titled “Celebrity Humanitarianism: The Ideology of Global Charity,” written by York University professor Ilan Kapoor and published in 2012.
Last month the website published an excerpt from “Celebrity Humanitarianism,” found here: http://www.wrongkindofgreen.org/category/non-profit-industrial-complex-organizations/organizations/humanitarian-agencies.
A book review that appears above the excerpt makes the entire non-profit industrial complex (NPIC) sound like one giant Trojan horse: “Ilan Kapoor’s stunning new book exposes the most appealing–and thus most dangerous–sacred cows of contemporary ideology: the humanitarian actor, the billionaire philanthropist, and the NGO. Kapoor shows that it is precisely where we feel most emotionally satisfied that we must be most suspicious.” — Todd McGowan, University of Vermont
Thanks for the info. I’ll have a look.
Why you did not mention Serbia (ex Yugoslavia) and “Otpor” with his leader Srđa Popović [ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Srđa_Popović_(activist) ] which topped serbian president Slobodan Milosevic in 1999.?
Srđa Popović with his organization CANVAS, also played major role in Arab Spring!
And you did not mention pivotal person: Gene Sharp! [ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gene_Sharp ]
James, please do consider investigating these people and their work!
CANVAS was (is) very very busy
Excellent documentary about CANVAS:
feat. Engdal, Sharp, Popović…..
The Revolution Business, 2011
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lpXbA6yZY-8
To further expand on a particular use of “Aid” organizations, there is an example in the US covert operation of funding the Contras in Nicaragua to overthrow the Sandinistas. Here are a few notes that I took while reading Gary Webb’s book, Dark Alliance.
NOTES:
State Department unit called Nicaraguan Humanitarian Assistance Office (NHAO), created in 1985, was used to oversee the delivery of $27 million in “humanitarian” aid Congress agreed to give the Contras. Top aid of Oliver North, Robert Duemling, was assigned to NHAO and used as a liaison to drug dealers that the CIA didn’t want to be seen with.
Duemling oversaw an NHAO contract with a Costa Rican shrimp company called Frigorificos de Puntarenas. Operating Frigorificos was the idea of a Medellín drug cartel accountant who used it, and many other businesses, to launder millions of dollars in drug money. In 1982, Frigorificos was taken over by a group of Miami-based drug traffickers. Cocaine was packed into containers with vegetables and fruit that was then shipped to the U.S.
The operation was made possible by a sister company called Ocean Hunter, that brought the caught fish from Frigorificos into Miami. Moises Nuñez, a Cuban Bay of Pigs veteran, suspected drug trafficker, and CIA agent, worked on the Costa Rican side and was a big part of the success of the operation.
Frigorificos was valuable to the State Department because of its international bank accounts that were used to broker “humanitarian aid” money to the Contras.
Yes indeed, James. Good report. I wrote about USAID, Freedom House, NED and others as it pertains to Ecuador but alas, everything has been shoved down the memory hole.
Ecuador now sees these players once again, since the coup d’etat in 2016.
They are everywhere influencing media, protests and such.
I lived in Nicaragua as a journalist all of 1985. We saw them there most certainly.
Your Quote,
“Let’s be clear: This is not to say that all NGOs are Trojan horses. It is not the case that every group or program that receives money from USAID or the National Endowment for Democracy or a similar organization is thereby automatically a deep state change agent. That is not how the Trojan horse technique works.
No, what makes these NGOs so effective as disguises for regime change operations is that much of the time, they are doing what they claim to be doing: providing aid, assistance and charity where it is needed. It is for this very reason that the US and its allies can so effectively smear NGO skeptics as crazy.”
The whole idea of a needle in a haystack works best if there is lots of hay. A stack of needles is pointless.
The whole idea of a needle in a haystack works best if there is lots of hay. A stack of needles is pointless.
Truth be told, a stack of needles is very pointy!
Sorry I couldn’t resist. 🙂
Hello everyone…
I keep going on about Human Nature (maybe i should use Human Behavior instead), but here is something i have just seen….
I was watching a very experienced journalist, who used to be a Muslim Brotherhood member, who decided to leave Muslim Brotherhood because he recognizes that what they are doing is not in the interest of Islam or Muslims, and they seems to be serving a different master..
When a wide awake guest says that Bukko Haram was a French secret police creation, and ISIS was a CIA creation and Muslim Brotherhood was MI5 creation, he nearly had fit. He can accept that the other two are created by secret police, but he cannot accept that Muslim Brotherhood is the same.
He is not stupid, he actually decided to leave them.. But he is unable to accept that they are the same as ISIS and Bokko Haram, even when the majority of the world accept that they are.
I guess if he does, it means he was a dumb mule (and a side note… why are mules suppose to be dumb??) for the period he was part of them.
That my friends is…. Human Nature (or behavior). Majority of the times, people prefer to do the wrong thing to save face… completely illogical.
Hello Voice of Arabi,
Many men leave the western military because they understand the dynamic, i.e.; they woke up to the con and did the right thing.
I didn’t see the WA interview, but I can spot men like this journalist (the guest) a mile away. He’s purveying half-truths…and we all know who loves to mix lies with the truth.
The devil exists only in the hearts and minds of men. Defeating him is the meaning of life itself.
There’s no room for evil on the new frontier!
Peace
Hello Gaslight,
You Say “The devil exists only in the hearts and minds of men. Defeating him is the meaning of life itself.”
That possibly is the greatest thing i heard this week… which reminds me of the fact that the fight with oneself is the biggest challenge of all.
thanks for that
You’re welcome brother,
Take it to the bank. It’s the reason why we’re here.
Achieving it is it’s own reward a thousand times over.
We all see the wonderful possibilities right in front of us.
Peace
Rats! Just submitted my response to you, VoA, but see that I failed to directly “reply” to you. In case you’re subscribing to direct replies to you alone, I hope you’ll see mine which is, unfortunately, standing alone just below.
Hey there, VoA. Hope you are well in your part of the world. As to human behavior, I don’t know if I’ve actually typed my thoughts out here or if they’ve merely been hammering the walls of my mind (because I think about it a lot, particularly as I live and watch my own family), but one thing that has stood out to me more than anything is that fear is the common denominator of human activity. Fear will justify throwing your loved ones under the bus to save face and, obviously, life. And it’s simultaneously painful and fascinating to me that people who live and breathe orthodox christianity are some of the most fearful and quick to trample their own to further their selfish desires, in stark contrast to the very words of the One they claim to hold as their moral compass.
Another common denominator (math was never my strong suit…can there be more than one denominator?…) is shame. You may recall my mentioning the open source investigation of Dr. Tjeerd Andringa called “Geopolitics and Cognition”. Though lengthy reading, it’s not dull or dry but highly fascinating. Broken into chapters a day, one could finish it in a week or so. To address shame, I include the link on that chapter:
geopoliticsandcognition.com/TheRootsOfViolence.html
P.S. Scpat and Gaslight, I include you two as well since you’ve both provided very interesting insight above.
Hello Pearl,
I hope you are well, thanks for the comment above, and it is very relevant, and i really like the link to the further reading.. It looks very promising.
You are absolutely right in saying that human nature appears to be driven by fear, pride, etc, more than logic and what is good for self and the group.
Thank you Pearl,
I’m a voracious reader and always looking for more. I’m sure Scpat will appreciate your thoughtful contribution too. It’s worth so much more than the money we give.
Yes indeed, James. Good report. I wrote about USAID, Freedom House, NED and others as it pertains to Ecuador but alas, everything has been shoved down the memory hole.
Ecuador now sees these players once again, since the coup d’etat in 2016.
They are everywhere influencing media, protests and such.
James I applaud your work. I hope we can do more to make more people aware of the value and so they become more informed.
How about this from Jimmy Dore… and his weird experience at the Human Rights Foundation’s ‘Freedom Forum’ in Oslo recently.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fhhyNm5rhHc
JD asks a polite, sensible question on whether the HRF would discuss US domestic human rights violations… and their masks slip… BIG TIME! (LMAO!)
Just watched this again and at 14:18 I sat up straight when I noticed a NYT headline: U.S. GROUPS HELPED NURTURE ARAB UPRISINGS… that I hadn’t noticed the first time around… And even more irksome to my ego was the CBC article “U.S. Admits funding Syrian Opposition” shown just after that at 14:45; Irksome because the leaked documents referred to by Mr Corbett had, according to CBC, been provided by Wikileaks…
So I was forced to take another look at Assange to see if I must reassess my conclusion that he’s a deep state asset. Though the alleged Wikileaked 2012 “Syria Files” have ultimately and predominantly served to hurt Assad this could legitimately be blamed on the media.
Just before the release, Assange himself is quoted as saying on his site:
“The material is embarrassing to Syria, but it is also embarrassing to Syria’s opponents. It helps us not merely to criticise one group or another, but to understand their interests, actions and thoughts. It is only through understanding this conflict that we can hope to resolve it.”
wikileaks.org/Syria-Files.html
A little lukewarm for someone who apparently had wind of a project to topple Syria as early as 2006.
medium.com/@caityjohnstone/the-us-empire-has-been-trying-to-regime-change-syria-since-long-before-2011-40d4e6648d54
And that statement was made after he’d recently taken credit for the ousting of the Ben Ali government, the first step in the so-called “Arab Spring”.
But the most compelling argument I’ve found against Assange and Wikileaks was made by Webster Tarpley:
“…Wikileaks = Cass Sunstein’s Program for Cognitive Infiltration In Action
It should be clear that Assange and Wikileaks are precisely the practical realization of Sunstein’s program for “cognitive infiltration” shock troops to counteract and overwhelm any real mass understanding of oligarchical domination in the modern world, and any discussion of what kind of economic policies are needed to secure a recovery from the present world depression.
In line with Sunstein’s recipe, Assange is a self-declared enemy of 9/11 truth…
…But the scandals Assange is offering target mostly the adversaries of the CIA…”
bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_wikileaks50.htm
Indeed, Assange’s roundabout ambiguous statements reminded me of articles written by Chomsky…
until recently…where he seems to have a clearer view of what’s actaully happening in Syria… which makes me think that this sequestration at the Ecuadorian embassy might have been what the doctor ordered to gradually set a momentarily floundering but potentially powerful propaganda priest back into the papal throne of orienting alternative opinion…a temporary crucifixion in the form “house arrest” to put the martyr’s shine back on his hacker’s halo.
All he needs now is a cherry-picking outspoken disciple/priestess à la Mary Magdalene for consecration and credibility to make it a movement…
Oh wait… could that be Johnstone the Apostle…?
[disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this comment are the sole responsability of the creature posting them and do not necessarily reflect those of the hapless website owner.]
Hello, we’re from USAID and we’re here to help!
Could you tell me if I have been ghost banned on any of these sites? Now I can only view my minds account if I have a cookie from logining into minds.com. Other wise I get a channel not found message.
https://www.minds.com/eoreor
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/eor/
https://www.brighteon.com/channel/laughingman
And in light of all of this, and the green hysteria rising, I’ll post this:
The manufacturing of Greta Thunberg and other “youth heroes”. There are 4 parts, part 3 and 4 don’t seem to have been published yet.
Part 1
http://www.wrongkindofgreen.org/2019/01/17/the-manufacturing-of-greta-thunberg-for-consent-the-political-economy-of-the-non-profit-industrial-complex/
Part 2:
http://www.wrongkindofgreen.org/2019/01/21/the-manufacturing-of-greta-thunberg-for-consent-the-inconvenient-truth-behind-youth-cooptation/
Holy friggin’ cannoli…
Can’t examine carefully just now but at a glance this looks profoundly disturbing… both for the youths involved and for humanity in general…
Will study your links asap!
Thanks FIW!
Yes, this is truly disgusting business. I’m still chewing through part 1, the parts with the fanatic quotes are difficult to digest….
Anyway, as far as I can gather WeDon’tHaveTime is a tech company run by that guy Ingmar Rentzhog, a name as ugly as himself. They aim to become a kind of environmental facebook, hijacking the void between businesses and consumers sort of speak. Instead of doing “normal advertising” these guys, with the success they plan to have with Thunberg’s campaign, will then open a platform on which brainwashed eco fans can up or downrate a business’ environmental rating, or we dont have time rating, thereby giving thumbs up or down to the most green oriented ones of their liking….to put it short, with the hysteria they are now hyping they aim to brainwash people into a massive demand for green initiatives, then they aim to become the managers of this green demand offering people the “service” to be able to rate/”vote” for the greenest business, allowing this to climb up this green neocommie hierarchy. No wonder, he’s trained by Al Gore, a guy who knows everything about racketeering, which is what this is, create a crisis, offer the solution making yourself indespensible and the only solution to it in the process in return for a big fat sum of money.
I think this article has uncovered some of the biggest parasites of our economy, people who are in the business of doing absolutely nothing productive, on the contrary, they represent a virus that is eating our society and economy up from within.
Oh, there’s a link in the first part leading to another interesting article
http://www.theartofannihilation.com/mckibbens-divestment-tour-brought-to-you-by-wall-street-part-xiii-the-increasing-vogue-for-capitalist-friendly-climate-discourse/
I think I’ve come across a pandora’s box! Please, do you know how to make oneself a member of Wattsupwiththat? I would like to post all of this in there
You can post without being a member. At least I have.
I’ve just tried to post now, like MKey said there’s no indication of whether your post has been accepted and/or displayed. It seems as if one has to become a member of WordPress of which wattsupwiththat is a blog….I’ll look into it
Well part 2 is interesting too, here are some extracts:
“As with all the shaping of our shared futures by the elite, the pathway to CCS is clear in the 2008 Green Alliance paper, A Last Chance for Coal, with contributions from Ben Caldecott while at the Policy Exchange think tank. The paper notes that it is critical Europe’s commitment to CCS be realized before 2020; 12 short years away from the paper’s publication date. The year 2020 is a critical date of vast significance – a recurring deadline for all environmental market solutions to be in place.”
No wonder they keep screaming on about 2020 and 2030 all the time, it’s all part of the plan.
Johnson and Johnson is also mentioned:
“…..Corporate partners that finance their endeavours also provide lofty sums of money to have their toxic legacies greenwashed. In July 2018 Johnson and Johnson was ordered to pay “nearly $4.7 billion US in total damages to 22 women and their families after they claimed asbestos in Johnson & Johnson talcum powder contributed to their ovarian cancer, in the first case against the company that focused on asbestos in the powder… Six of the 22 plaintiffs in the latest trial have died from ovarian cancer. … Mark Lanier, lead counsel for the plaintiffs, said in a statement that Johnson & Johnson had covered up evidence of asbestos in their products for more than 40 years……”
The gaming and credit score system:
“…..Global Citizen is perhaps the most egregious NGO in the non-profit industrial complex with its grotesque model of shallow, hollowed-out “activism” and corporatization. Recently Global Citizen has introduced “points” that can be accumulated by clicking on actions. In a blatant emulation of credit cards (the more money you spend, the more points you acquire), the more actions you click, the more points you acquire. These points can then be redeemed for access to celebrity events and concerts.
This is the social engineering of unquestioning compliance and instantaneous acquiescence. In order to receive the reward, one must perform the action requested. If you do not comply, you simply do not receive the points. Here the encouragement for critical thought and debate is deliberately and strategically erased from the equation……”
It really turns the inside out on a lot of issues! Though I don’t agree fully with all of their viewpoints. One thing that I certainly disagree with is that they don’t even question the Paris agreement.
By the way, could someone enlighten me as to what “Storytelling” actually is? To me it seems like some managerial mombo jombo term.
Maybe I should have paid more attention in the Management lessons, but I’ve always found that, along with Sociology, to be pseudoscientific clap trap for people who are too useless to do something concrete or too lazy to pick up a shovel and get something done.
TripAdvisor! Not facebook, TripAdvisor is the business model they aim to implement, so a sort of green TripAdvisor….amazing, making money, billions, out of nothing based on a problem that doesn’t exist…..this planet will go straight to hell if people don’t put down their slave devices and wake up soon!
Sowell: the catchwords “climate change deniers” reveals nothing but a political crusade
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/01/27/sowell-the-catchwords-climate-change-deniers-reveals-political-crusade/
Thanks Mkey, looks interesting
To comment on their site it appears there no login options, they appear to be using a guest system of sorts. I posted a comment, didn’t receive any feedback, probably the message is in the moderation queue.
Once again, thanks. This article is damn good and to the point, I think, and actually goes hand in hand with the Thunberg/We Don’t Have Time affair.
The point about the climate that has always changed is so true, fossiles in the Sahara, where my parents live used to be seafloor during the Viking age long before anyone even knew about CO2. I remember finding fossiles there, one which I kept in my room, when I was a kid. The term “climate change denier” has become the green version of the “conspiracy theorist” catchword.
I’ll try to see if I can post in there
Jeez! Read the comment section below part 1! There’s a nutter who wants more GMO’s to counter global warming by reducing the farming sector! Oh God, the more I read the more depressed I get, I’m getting out now to get some air and get ready for part 2!
Part 3 is out!
http://www.wrongkindofgreen.org/2019/01/28/the-manufacturing-of-greta-thunberg-for-consent-the-most-inconvenient-truth-capitalism-is-in-danger-of-falling-apart/
I urge anyone who sees this thread to read this part! It’s got a lot of important information. The connection between we don’t have time and people in the Club of Rome. Especially the part about M-Kopa Solar, a banking-on-the-poor investment scheme in green camouflage says a lot about what is awaiting us in the future if we continue to fall for this. Finally there’s a part of it that analyzes how these social media campaigns are kickstarted and gain momentum. A lot of what James has been talking about for a long time is demonstrated in this very piece!
I would love to hear some other people’s comments on this
Another very good point too is the fact that Greta Thunberg and her parents are all born in wealth! I simply can’t wrap my head around how people can ignore this obvious contradiction between people who are advocating “saving” the planet on the backs of the poor while belonging to the very same elite that will be benefitting from all of this! Watching them hob knob with other elitarians, giving and receiving self made awards and titles, in their cozy well designed surroundings while people they claim to help in Africa can’t even afford to have the lights on turns my stomach out. This is medieval 2.0 on stereoids and it’s disgusting!.
Thanks for keeping us informed of the Greta Thunberg installments, FIW. I read the first three acts today and found them every bit as eye-opening and disturbing as you portray them. Please let us know when Act IV is published.
The quote by artist Hiroyuki Hamada that *REAL* investigative reporter Cory Morningstar chose to open her series with says it all:
“What’s infuriating about manipulations by Non Profit Industrial Complex is that they harvest good will of the people, especially young people. They target those who were not given skills and knowledge to truly think for themselves by institutions which are designed to serve the ruling class. Capitalism operates systematically and structurally like a cage to raise domesticated animals. Those organizations and their projects which operate under false slogans of humanity in order to prop up the hierarchy of money and violence are fast becoming some of the most crucial elements of the invisible cage of corporatism, colonialism and militarism.”
It pains me to admit that I used to write for several mainstream financial publications, including a couple of reputable Wall Street magazines. Little did I know what a credulous, ill-informed, unthinking, impressionable journalist I was. It never occurred to me to question the motives or actions of the corporate executives, investment banking titans, and equity and fixed-income research stars whom I regularly interviewed for feature articles. For 20-plus years I believed every word uttered by these silver-tongued charmers.
As if that weren’t pathetic enough, for the next 10 years I subscribed, along with my liberal-leaning animal activist friends, to every fearmongering word uttered by Al Gore, by the environmental NGOs, and by the MSM’s servile global-warming hypesters.
My airy-fairy bubble burst in late 2010, when a new friend mentioned that she was researching the events of 9/11. Thank goodness I was curious enough to ask what she meant. She steered me to AE911Truth’s petition. One of the best decisions I ever made was to follow her to that website and from there down the endless, maze-like rabbit hole that leads — when one avoids the rabbit hole’s highway robbers (false flaggers, infiltrators, psyop agents, limited hangouters, controlled opposition, pseudo environmentalists and the like) — to TRUTH.
And now I’ve found one of the truthiest sites I could ever hope to encounter, The Corbett Report, where fellow sincere freedom-seekers are thoughtful, experienced, and wise enough to rarely be fooled — and cannot be tricked by Blood & Gore (gotta read Morningstar’s Act III to understand that reference!).
Thank you very much for your comment! I was starting to wonder as to whether I was going crazy thinking that this indeed shows the belly of the beast, now I’m resting a bit more assured. Yes, you can be sure that I’ll post it when part 4 comes out since I’m following this closely. I think no matter what side you’re on in this topic, personally I’m against the whole CO2 hustle, but anyone, a “believer” or not, should be interested in this since none of the sides will benefit by these fraudsters, these genuine parasites taking over the narrative and the legislation. Only when this pest is gone we can have a genuine debate, which is, of course, what they know and will try to prevent above all. People have been talking about a future new false flag for years now, I think this is it! This is the coup de gras that they’re planning, I think, to wrestle the last bit of our once relatively free societies away from us. I’m just as sick and tired as everyone else about this whole pseudodebate, and the least I want is to feed it, but I think that this is exactly the danger of it, while everybody is looking for that new 911, or whatever thing that goes boom, or is too apathetic because nobody is being killed, directly that is, they’re going to sneek this poison in with our own help and choke everything. This is worse than gladio because most people are either diluted by it or don’t give a damn until it’s too late, it’s ugly green mustard gas disguised in a pink fluffy cloud that’ll make everyone inhale it and they can do so much more with it, and stealthily, than they could with a thousand ISIS’s.
Thank you also for your insight into your own experience with them and the mainstream media. Realizing that something is going on is difficult enough in itself, but for someone like you to realize it, to act upon it and come around is even more difficult and shows integrity and courage which I admire. You should write, tell people about your experiences, people like you more than anyone would be able to inform us/others about this. Actually, I might need your help one day in this respect.
FIW et al.,
Wrong Kind of Green released Greta Thunberg Act IV a few days ago: http://www.wrongkindofgreen.org/2019/02/03/the-manufacturing-of-greta-thunberg-for-consent-the-house-is-on-fire-the-90-trillion-dollar-rescue
It seems an ACT V (the final one before the curtain closes) has recently been added, though it’s not out yet.
Author Morningstar’s summation of the Greta Thunberg phenomenon in Act IV hits the proverbial nail squarely on the head. She writes:
“A climate revolution in name only, this said emergency has nothing to do with the protection of our Earth—or climate—and never will. Rather, it has everything to do with saving, protecting and expanding the capitalist economy—at the expense of our already decimated planet. And nothing more than that. This oncoming new onslaught of environmental devastation and plunder—in the name of climate revolution—will make all of modern man’s historical violence against the nature up to this point seem like childish prattle.
“Yet none of this should come as a surprise. As the oligarchs financed, shaped and largely managed the climate movement, it’s only natural that they alone benefit from it. The power-elites repackaged our oppression as revolution and sold it back to us. By exploiting the innocent youth, which in turn exploited our emotions and fears as a collective populace, we devoured it. And soon, young Greta and all the youth they have exploited will be thrown under the bus. It’s all par for the course under capitalism.”
Appropriately, Morningstar’s final paragraph links to a short clip from the Asche experiment on social conformity. And isn’t that what the climate change instigators are counting on? Propaganda experts and fleecing artists that they are, they’re betting that if they use innocent-acting, desperate-sounding, heartstring-tugging children to sound the alarm bells loud enough and long enough, each of us will ultimately capitulate, conform, join the Thunberg parade, and march straight into the arms of our greedy exploiters without ever realizing that they are the enemy, not our friends.
Morningstar says of the Asche experiment: “During the 1950s Solomon Asch conducted and published a series of experiments that demonstrated the degree to which an individual’s own opinions are influenced by those of a majority group.” [1m:57s]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qA-gbpt7Ts8
Well, thanks for this CQ. A lot to stomach there…
on a nano-note, I noticed with a chuckle as I was browsing through all that mire that one of my heros (yea I need heros)
François Gervais was right;
indeed, he pointed out in his December 2018 conference (chuckling) that whenever the propaganda machine tries to instill terror about poisonous carbon emissions being apocalyptically pumped into our atmosphere they always show backlit cooling towers, meaning,
water vapor (indeed by far the most abundant of the GHGs but…)
at 54:55
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iK3G8wqqp_k
Water vapor is 97% of all greenhose gasses volume, is it not? Toxic, death bringing water.
yuck! So true! All that deathly H2O! That’s why we’ll soon be (or are already) fighting vicious international wars to appropriate, horde and gain control of as much of it as possible! It’s going to kill us all!!!!!
(Well that silliness occupied the bus ride at least)
Sent from my almost empty Huawei phone.
Haha! Yeah, I’ve noticed that too! Actually, only a few weeks ago I saw a Greenpeace doom porn video showing exactly that, and the first thing I thought was, that’s vapor you cretins!
Oh my God! How embarassing! HAHA
Coming back after some days I rushed to check and never noticed that CQ had already posted it. Sorry!
Forget everything I said below!
Haven’t looked closely, just a lightening skim of the Vanessa Beeley Gilet Jaune article
and I felt acutely embarassed myself
so disconnected from all this institutionalized violence and cruelty…
I know the demonstrations are happening in ‘my’ city as they’ve been making me late for my classes, immobilizing the bus network…
but I just continue my daily survival routine, ‘metro-boulot-dodo’ as we say here (commute-work-sleep), just trying to pay my bills an’ all…especially since they’ve begun seizing income tax money ‘at the source’…
the teen-age manbearpig in me is bitterly disdainful of my attitude
but the grumpy old manbearpig knows you can’t win a confrontational battle with an enemy who has all the weapons.
a bit easy though. I’m sure Vanessa Beeley rightly thinks so.
just fascinating how we can all remain so compartmentalized…if we want to…
now back to hamster wheel…
Well, I highly recommend going through the wrongkindofgreen articles. I see it as quite a bombshell and I don’t understand how other alt media sources could have missed it, it’s just sitting there on a more or less unknown website. Of course, maybe I’m wrong, I’m not a journalist, but the way I see it it ties everything perfectly together.
Hahaha! Not to worry, FIW. I was wondering where you’d gone, so I decided to post it myself, hoping you’d see it. Remember, if you hadn’t been so helpful posting Acts 1 through 3, I never would’ve known to read it and respond to you a week or so ago.
In fact, the four acts were the perfect ammo for me to pass along to a friend who sent this climate change hoax of an article to me this morning (she pointed out that the story originally ran in The Guardian, which figures!): https://www.motherjones.com/environment/2019/02/when-europeans-colonized-the-americas-they-killed-so-many-that-the-earths-climate-cooled/?utm_source=mj-newsletters&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=econundrums-2019-02-11
I have both you and manbearpig to thank for steering me to Vanessa Beeley’s take on the gilets jaunes. So, please, you guys, don’t be embarrassed by anything you’ve said or haven’t said, done or haven’t done. We’re all supporting one another as we wade through this lovely mess created by the NWO dictators and their NGO and gendarme puppets.
I’d like to think that every time we point out a non-fake news report like Beeley’s or a series of essays like Morningstar’s, we’re helping not only one another but also the entire world extract itself from the sinkhole/slime/cesspool (take your pick) that the imaginary “elite” have created and in which they’re only burying themselves with their lies, deceit, and haughty disdain for Life, Truth, and Love.
“…Hahaha! Not to worry, FIW. I was wondering where you’d gone, so I decided to post it myself, hoping you’d see it…”
Well, thanks 🙂
“..In fact, the four acts were the perfect ammo for me to pass along to a friend who sent this climate change hoax of an article to me this morning..”
Well, that article has been posted at WUWT as far as I remember, the one from your friends that is, or was it climatedepot? Marc Morano’s site. Already in the headline you can see the eugenicist tone, we, people, are the problem, when enough of us are killed off the climate will cool….you know, manbearpig is wondering how we got this compartmentalized, I’m wondering how the h… we got from where we were before to accepting that anyone publishes such vile, venomous….puke, maybe the compartmentalization has caused this.
“..I’d like to think that every time we point out a non-fake news report like Beeley’s or a series of essays like Morningstar’s, we’re helping not only one another but also the entire world extract itself from the sinkhole/slime/cesspool (take your pick) that the imaginary “elite” have created..”
Yes, I agree…whether it’s actually doing anything or not, I can’t help but to try because this world is getting more and more unbearable by the minute. I often hear words such as “yeah I know, it’s not good, but you know, there’s nothing you can do so just ignore it and enjoy life” enjoy life!? What is left of it to enjoy? They’ve taken nearly everything away there is to enjoy and now they’re back for seconds. Maybe I won’t gain anything, maybe I’ll go down on it, but I don’t care, I’ll claw away the best I can even if it’s in vain because I’ve simply had it.
“..Appropriately, Morningstar’s final paragraph links to a short clip from the Asche experiment on social conformity. And isn’t that what the climate change instigators are counting on? ..”
Yes, that and something more, lawfare, the many of us who really do not conform will be herded into it by the many laws that the governments, thanks to these charades, will now have a perfect pretext to introduce. I cannot help but to think of all of them, the NGOs, their footsoldier activists, the billionaires and the governments working as one. To me it seems that some of these activities are just staged events, like Greta’s “speech” at Davo”, to create a pretext for these people to introduce long-ago planned draconic legislation because they’re under “pressure”. It’s like the terrorism narrative/pretext all over again, we’ve seen it all before, shock and awe in a new wrapping.
Yea, it’s another terrorism narrative, totally…
and underpopulation situtation planned for the latter part of the century will be accentuated as the “Save the planet, Stop having children” meme is assimilated from birth… (not a very excellent, just the most recent WUWT article on the subject):
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/02/12/are-childless-climate-change-eco-worriers-modern-day-shakers/
wanted to link UN underpopulation report but computer says “not found”…anyhow…
shit. even from work it says “not found” when I click on the link:
https://www.google.com/search?q=united+nations+demographic+report+2009+aging+world+population&rlz=1CAASUB_enFR716FR766&oq=united+nations+demographic+report+2009+aging+world+population&aqs=chrome..69i57.16970j0j8&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
have to pull out my hard copy and scan it…
You mean this one?
http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/ageing/WPA2015_Report.pdf
Tell me if it’s not the one/not working either
This should take you to a printable pdf version of the 2009 report
http://www.algec.org/biblioteca/WPA2009_WorkingPaper.pdf
While waiting for part 4, I came across this:
https://www.globalresearch.ca/gilets-jaunes-civilians-in-police-crosshairs-as-macron-adopts-totalitarian-state-practices-to-suppress-dissent/5667205?print=1
Nothing to do with NGOs, but one could say a result of their handy work and written by no other than Vanessa Beeley, a name that most in this forum should know by now 🙂
Part 4 is out!
http://www.wrongkindofgreen.org/2019/02/03/the-manufacturing-of-greta-thunberg-for-consent-the-house-is-on-fire-the-90-trillion-dollar-rescue/
This part will be very interesting, I think, since it will dig into the campaign itself and the actors and benefited.
FIW , et.al. I make an observation here about the dangers of behavioral modifications. The Climate Mobilization and Margaret Salamon, Naomi Klein and the overlapping of crisises . Over whelm and induced fear. These are really greedy evil people. Dane Wiggington comes to mind but I don’t know who funds his NGO 504c. Anyone know? Trying to hold back the tide here. What happened to Jane Goodall? Maybe my perceptions and receptions have finally tuned into the real broadcast.
“…FIW , et.al. I make an observation here about the dangers of behavioral modifications. The Climate Mobilization and Margaret Salamon, Naomi Klein and the overlapping of crisises . Over whelm and induced fear…”
Yeah, they’re screwing around with people’s subcontious instincts, it’s like opening a pandora’s box of irrationality and hysteria. We’ve seen this many times before, the medieval and its lynchmobs and which burnings comes to my mind, that, and the nazi Hitler Jugend, they borrow from many “books”.
Regarding Dane Wiggington and Jane Goodall, what do you think these 2 have to do with it?
FIW: Danes constant hammering the ” end of the world” fear. Not as convincing as Ted Gundersun ,This may be his over-emotional way to awaken people so traumatized by 50 years of propaganda and programming. The counter-approch available by Tony Heller, Jim Lee and Herndon is milder in scope but they too may be trying to depict a “monster threat” by committee. I know something is very wrong but what is being depicted is in many shades of Grey.
Jane Goodall seems to be a figment of years of programming by the Fabian’s, Darwinist and Eugenics societies. I feel used as she must feel and just wants to keep a good income stream alive.
It all seems a dream, manufactured dream , but I can’t clearly or convincingly say what they have to do with what I see every other day in the sky right over my head.
Controlled opposition, gate-keeping?
FIW. They could also be as sincere as they come. Truly believing in their truth and reality created by their truth.
What do you think those two have to do with “it”?
Im struggling with Wiggingtons past and the tragectory Geoengineering watch is on. His encounter with G.Edward Griffin was strange to say the least. I care for Jane but not her business.
What’s the end game about ?
“..Danes constant hammering the ” end of the world” fear. Not as convincing as Ted Gundersun..”
My point with the Scandinavian link was not so much yet another bunch of hustlers hammering fear into people, but more the power center it seems to have become, is becoming. Countries like that are a perfect camouflage since they have managed to delude the world into believing that they are peace loving and anything but malevolent. I can tell you that people here look to those countries thinking that everything they say and do is ideal and the way forward. What they don’t see is the massive arms industry there supplying and cashing in on Nato led wars, the technology developed there for both weapons and surveillance, the draconic measures that slip through without as much as a cough, their deep involvement in this “green new deal” etc., they’re increasingly more and more the center of this dark power that sweeps across the world and with a perfect, innocent mask.
FIW, could you please explain what you mean about Gunderson? I thought he was one of the FBI’s good guys who stood up to pedophiles, etc., and was possibly suicided, but it now appears I haven’t read or watched the material that shines the full light of truth on him. Or am I interpreting your remark backwards?
Oh sorry, no, I wasn’t referring to Gunderson at all, I was referring to the involvment of Scandinavian countries in a lot of the past, present and future misdeeds of the world, an involvment that often goes unnoticed, instead “Uncle Sam” or the big Russian bear usually take the limelight on this, but as you can read in all of the wrongkindofgreen articles, they’re in it up to their necks sort of speak.
It seems that this bit of the last part could be an answer to Jane Goodall’s role in all of this:
“..It draws attention to increasing number of mountain gorillas – just prior to Jane Goodall’s promotional support of a fourth industrial revolution in January of 2019 in Davos. A revolution that consequently demands fivefold the minerals and metals we are already using as fast as we can. The very same metals that cause the conflict and resulting death of Congolose men, women and children – and gorillas..”
According to wrongkindofgreen, she’s yet another celebrity ledning credibility to their 100 trillion dollar public funds heist, which is the only way I can describe this lunacy. That’s what she was doing in Davos with Greta.
Part 5.1 is out, I’ll start posting in the https://www.corbettreport.com/why-technocrats-love-the-green-new-deal/ thread instead for those who are interested
Great! Thanks for letting us know and also for posting in the technocracy/new green deal thread, FIW.
I’m off to read Act V, Part I now: http://www.wrongkindofgreen.org/2019/02/13/the-manufacturing-of-greta-thunberg-for-consent-the-new-green-deal-is-the-trojan-horse-for-the-financialization-of-nature
Oh, and I see there’s an addendum on AOC: http://www.wrongkindofgreen.org/2019/02/15/the-branding-of-alexandria-ocasio-cortez-by-any-means-necessary-addendum
Thanks for the heads up on Occasional Cortez :)) Hadn’t noticed it, I’ll have a look. Fantastic how quickly we can map those connections now and scary how far and wide they actually reach
Oh CQ, you’re a superstar! In that link I found a link to a Spanish version of James’ article on the green new deal, finally I have something for all of the non English speakers around me! And you’d be surprised by how many they are, Thanks!
The 6th and final part is out:
http://www.wrongkindofgreen.org/2019/02/24/the-manufacturing-of-greta-thunberg-a-decade-of-social-manipulation-for-the-corporate-capture-of-nature-crescendo/
Can anyone please recommend any good ngos or charities to donate to that do indeed help those in need around the world?
Saleem,
Wow! What a great heart you have!
I wish you luck on your journey to finding the right fit.
My degree is in the Environmental Sciences, and so I have a strong concern about toxins and health.
Here are a couple places which I personally like…
Fluoride Action Network
https://fluoridealert.org/
FAN (Fluoride Action Network) right now is focused on an EPA lawsuit. It should go to trial around the end of 2019.
This lawsuit stands out beyond any other lawsuit against the EPA. If successful, it opens the door for other citizen groups to file a lawsuit against the EPA in order to change things for the better. This could be the start of really stopping many pollutants and harmful toxins.
As we know, the EPA administrators are very corrupt (e.g. Corbett’s work on “Christine Todd Whitman”). There are many highly dangerous toxins which the EPA ignores, because it benefits industrial corporations or the military.
FAN also has a focus on other harmful chemicals, besides ‘just water fluoridation’. The Teflon like chemicals are in the blood system of most the world’s population now; as is aluminum.
They are very frugal with any donations which come in. The money is spent cautiously.
~~~
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. (the son of the assassinated Bobby Kennedy, JFK’s brother). Robert is an Environmental Scientist, but also a damn good attorney.
His heart is in the right place. He has worked tirelessly on many, many different endeavors trying to help people and change things for the better.
He was a main attorney on the first landmark Monsanto trial. He has long fought big corporations for their bad practices which harm people and the environment.
He even wrote a book in order to get a wrongly convicted person released. (“Framed: Why Michael Skakel Spent Over a Decade in Prison for a Murder He Didn’t Commit”)
For years, he has been fighting mercury. For example: The coal industry bears a huge responsibility for much of the mercury found in fish. Mercury has been and is still being used in vaccines. Toxic aluminum also.
Kennedy is concerned about children, as we all are.
Children’s Health Defense
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/
Anyway, these are two NGO’s which I vouch for.
Corbett has mentioned Robert F. Kennedy before, showing a great clip.
Corbett also has interviewed FAN’s Dr. Paul Connett and discussed fluoride on a variety of occasions.
A keynote: Both of these organizations will have far reaching worldwide benefits, because the world tends to follow the U.S. policies.
My degree is in the Environmental Sciences, and so I have a strong concern about toxins and health.
That’s a very weird way of putting it. I’d say it’s the other way around.
mkey, I’m laughing. Yea, that is right.
Mid-January 2022 – A Corbett Flashback Revist
Watching this again, I really appreciate the tremendous imagery in the video.
I watched this on the altcensored.com YouTube link. It was the first time I watched a full video on that platform. It was nice.
Corbett showed us how to play his removed YouTube videos on AltCensored by adding the last piece identifier (e.g. -r9UrC2uFfM with this video.)
How to Find Deleted Videos – Questions For Corbett #081
https://www.corbettreport.com/qfc081-deletedvideos/
A re-run of “NGOs Are The Deep State’s Trojan Horses” is very timely, because Russia and UKRAINE are in the news cycle big-time.
See Below:
“As part of its plans, Russia is laying the groundwork to have the option of fabricating a pretext for invasion,”
White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki told reporters on Friday [Jan 14th, 2022].
“We have information that indicates Russia has already pre-positioned a group of operatives to conduct a false flag operation in eastern Ukraine.”
“Without getting into too much detail, we do have information that indicates that Russia is already working actively to create a pretext for a potential invasion, for a move on Ukraine,”
“In fact, we have information that they’ve pre-positioned a group of operatives, to conduct what we call a false flag operation, an operation designed to look like an attack on them or their people, or Russian speaking people in Ukraine, as an excuse to go in.”
Above script taken from:
False Flags Suddenly No Longer A Crazy Conspiracy Theory by Caitlin Johnstone
https://caityjohnstone.medium.com/false-flags-suddenly-no-longer-a-crazy-conspiracy-theory-62d02a2d3a4
~~~~~~~~~~~~
[I have to laugh at the “false flag” mention. The saying goes: “It takes one to know one.”]
Hey HRS!
I agree with you that James’ replaying of the NGO video couldn’t be more timely.
In fact, just before I found it and your comment, I happened to listen to this one-hour conversation between Tom Woods and Scott Horton on US/Russia relations: https://tomwoods.com/ep-2044-important-scott-horton-on-us-russia-dangers
The only part of their discussion I questioned was when Scott mentioned that the Middle East had gotten back at the US by destroying its towers (or something to that effect). Really, Mr. Horton? Is that how it happened?
I don’t know much about Scott other than his name and the fact that he’s been covering foreign affairs for many moons. Speaking of moons, he and Tom spoke highly of Moon of Alabama’s coverage of the US meddling in Ukraine and of America’s position vis a vis Russia.
Yes indeed, HRS: It takes a false flag to know a false flag.
CQ !
It is good to hear your voice!
Boy!…This Holiday Christmas Season brought us very mild and warm temperatures here in Texas. I’m sure it was warmer by the Gulf than up here. Well, now in January, up here, we are finally getting some temps below freezing…that will help curb the bugs in the summer.
Hope you had some nice Holidays CQ.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
For non-English speakers…DEFINITION
“It takes one to know one.”
A retort used to suggest that the person who has accused someone of being something negative thing is in fact that thing (as if being that thing would help one to identify others of like kind).
A: “You’re a real jerk!” B: “Yeah, well, it takes one to know one!”
A: “I don’t want to sit next to her—she’s a nerd!” B: “Takes one to know one!”
The person who expressed criticism has similar faults to the person being criticized.
This classic retort to an insult dates from the early 1900s.
For example, You say she’s a terrible cook? It takes one to know one!
For a synonym, see “pot calling the kettle black”. A near equivalent is the proverbial “it takes a thief to catch a thief”, meaning “no one is better at finding a wrongdoer than another wrongdoer.”
First recorded in 1665, it remains current.
Hello James,
Well, you´re right, and all the time the govvernments and corportations trying to purchase the NGO’s medium size and of the “alternative media” nowadays. What can we say about the latest scandal of the apparently respected and “good people” trying to help, with NGO´s, DERRICK BROZE. I know it’s your friend or colleague. I was watching him in the beginning of the scamdemic, however he has changed a lot.
He said he was an American with Indian roots and so good, communicating good topics, however, since more than 1 year ago it’s evident he’s just trying to make drugs, politics and money here in Mexico, with his “useless” new conferences that turned into a circus with music, drugs and doesn’t offer any REAL SOLUTION.
And he was so aggresive with some of his audience in the social media…. And finally his mask fell down, as last week ALISON MCDOWELL revealed who he really is. I recommend to watch her video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qABjrl9Dao8&t=6924s
VIDEO OF: Alisopn McDowell Channel
TITLE: Questioning “The Greater Reset III” – Where is this Resistance Headed?
PUBLISHED: January 9th, 2022.
TOPIC: She’s always worried about kids and education in her research. This time the topic is THE GREATER RESET “CAMPAIGN” OF DERRICK BROZE. where she reveals what he’s doing:
1. He now is promoting a program for kids in Mexico, so he says “the poor kids can work in videogaming blockchain and at the same time earning money for their families”.
2. The real interest is: theres is a Singapur corporation involved in this, an investor to gather poor kids for gaming and pay them few cents.
3. Singapur corportations DOESN’T PAY TAXES as it’s a tax haven.
4. The UN Agenda 2030 people in involved in that, she said.
4. She reveals who’s behind (big billionaires) the programs and NGO’S trying to catch control of the kids, monitoring them by the games, making their future slaves, she explains in detail.
5. She reveals too the way Derrick Broze deals with their audience and even his people is threatening others, liks saying “get rid of”.
MY PERSONAL POIINT OF VIEW:
1. Was he purchased by the big corporations or mafia? Is he stupid? Or he just wants money and fame???
2. He delcared he is now Mexican! wen before year ago he said he will go and come back to Mexico and finally stayed ni Mexico to scape the vax and scape the police.
3. Now he say he´s married? For convenience.
4. I HOPE HE GET OUT OF HERE, MEXICO, ALL FOREIGNERS ARE WELCOME, BUT WHEN SOMEONE COMES TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE POOR PEOPLE THAT’S NOT CORRECT AND THE KIDS MUST BE AT SCHOOL AND PLAYING WITH THEIR FAMILIES AND FRIENDS.
NOT TO CHILD LABOR FORCE. NOT TO FUTURE CHILD ROBOT SLAVES.
Derrick Broze will receive a big lesson from God or karma or whatever you call it.
WATCH THE FULL VIDEO AND YOU’LL SEE…
I’m so sad that is happening with the alternative media. More and more are being purchased by the government and betraying the people.
[SNIP – Please keep comments to 500 words or less. Longer comments can be split into multiple posts. -JC]
Cass Sunstein was loudly laughing about this scuttlebutt the other day.
Finally succeeded in joining. As an 81 yr old ex-pat I have had the pleasure of befriending NGO operatives. One of their big worries is Grant Money. I also noticed that they often were dedicated to the stated goals. In addition to being Trojan Horses, their behavior often revealed ulterior motives in their personal lives. Cambodia seemed to be a favorite posting for those who loved children, perhaps excessively.
mfph,
Welcome! I’m sure I speak for everyone on these comment boards. Glad you are here.
Thanks for the NGO anecdote.
I could see how Cambodia with their current educational format would be attractive by those with ulterior motivations.